|
|
Post by Jim Rutherford/Pens GM on Jul 16, 2017 22:56:16 GMT -5
Anders Nilsson
2016/2017: 47.1 fpts (26 GP) - Backup
2015/2016: 23.1 fpts (29 GP) - Backup
2014/2015: DNP - N/A
2013/2014: 16.1 fpts (16 GP) - Backup
Nilsson falls under:
"Bridge Contract Rule: 2 year max contract term
Players who fall into one or more of the following criteria are subject to the Bridge Contract Rule:
a) 2 or less full NHL seasons (30+ games) played in last 4 NHL seasons"
Penguins offer 2 years @ 1,250,000
|
|
|
|
Post by Devils GM(Colin) on Jul 18, 2017 0:25:57 GMT -5
Based on the new rules about goalies going to new situations... I have to say that Nilsson is being given one of those situations.
No he is not the clear and away starter, but he is going to be given the opportunity to take the crease from the other netminder who is in the exact same situation. Two goalies that have both never played in more than 32 games in a season to share the crease, the math says barring injuries they should both get more than they have had this coming season.
For this we know that he will have a possibly increased role and I would like to see him get the full value of his points from last season or more and he also just came off his best year statistically.
I know it's table scraps but I'd like to see him get at least 1.5 per yr possibly 1.75.
Disapproved 0-1
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 19, 2017 20:03:15 GMT -5
I think that based on the rubric, this seems reasonable. The new rule about goalies going to a new situation seems to only determine whether or not the goalie should be offered a bridge contract or not. Think the salary is offered based on the prior two seasons and is a fair representation of the player to this point.
1-1
|
|
|
|
Post by JetsGM (Jacob) on Jul 20, 2017 19:09:37 GMT -5
Agree with Colin, don't think he should be in a lower salary bracket after this season and looking ahead to this upcoming season. Splitting hairs, but minimum is 1.5 and that's where I'd like it to be.
1-2
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2017 13:39:10 GMT -5
1-3
I also agree that I would be looking at 1.5M at minimum. Why soo low when anyone under 2M in the minor will not count against the cap. I will approved 2 years at 1.5M per.
|
|
