|
|
Post by chris - Hartford Whalers on Oct 18, 2020 15:23:12 GMT -5
2019/2020: 68/65gp (1.05) - Tier 3
2018/2019: 81/68gp (1.19) - Tier 2
2017/2018: 77/70gp (1.1) - Tier 2
average 1.11 fppg
most recent season he falls in middle of 2-2.75m range. His 3 years are actually really consistent and him dropping to tier 3 is just due to how the tiers break as he was only .06 below his average this year.
2yrs @ 2.5m
|
|
|
|
Post by JetsGM (Jacob) on Oct 18, 2020 16:26:56 GMT -5
Denied 0-1. I know I'm splitting hairs here denying on a small amount, but bridge rule calls that players with 2 previous seasons in a higher tier need to go up 1 salary range. For 1 year, I may have let it slide, but for the 2nd, I need to see it in the 2.75-3 range.
|
|
|
|
Post by San Jose Sharks (Alex/Taco) on Oct 18, 2020 18:02:41 GMT -5
I think this is fair, if it was more than 2 years I would be against it.
1-1
|
|
|
|
Post by CarolinaHurricanesGM on Oct 18, 2020 18:52:23 GMT -5
I am so torn on this one. If you average his three seasons, you get that 1.11, which would be minimum 2.75M. If last season was even closer to the 1fpt/g, I might side with you on the two year deal @ 2.5, but he was at 1.2 fpts/g 2018-19. I just don't think there is enough to justify giving him 2.5 (which is paying for exactly what he did last season, his worst season). He's young, and will likely get more chances this upcoming year. I will have to deny this, and advise something in that 2.75-3 range. Sorry to split hairs with you Chris, but just too hard for me to accept this.
1-2
|
|
|
|
Post by Devils GM(Colin) on Oct 19, 2020 0:12:35 GMT -5
Agreed, in a tier higher 2 previous seasons, must go one salary range higher. Bare minimum is 2.75 per year per the rules
Loui Calls him up to tell him to fight tooth and nail
1-3
|
|
