Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2017 7:10:48 GMT -5
David Pastrnak
2016-17: 1.73 ppg (46 games) - tier 1 2015-16: 1.00 ppg (51 games) - tier 3 2014-15: 0.97 ppg (75 games) - tier 3 2013-14:N/A
Rationale: This is an interesting scenario. Qualifies for bridge deal as big jump in tier group this year. He also qualifies for a salary that is below his last season pay rate as his first two seasons were two ties below. However, he is clearly on an upward trend which means he qualifies for a salary that is above his performance last year. I cancelled those two factors and offered him a bridge deal at the lower of his pay range as he just came into the 9-10M bracket.
Offer: 2 years at 9 mil. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2017 13:02:11 GMT -5
I like it, but damn is he expensive! 1-0
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2017 13:36:31 GMT -5
David Pastrnak
2016-17: 1.73 ppg (46 games) - tier 1 2015-16: 1.00 ppg (51 games) - tier 3 2014-15: 0.97 ppg (75 games) - tier 3 2013-14:N/A
Rationale: This is an interesting scenario. Qualifies for bridge deal as big jump in tier group this year. He also qualifies for a salary that is below his last season pay rate as his first two seasons were two ties below. However, he is clearly on an upward trend which means he qualifies for a salary that is above his performance last year. I cancelled those two factors and offered him a bridge deal at the lower of his pay range as he just came into the 9-10M bracket.
Offer: 2 years at 9 mil. He doesn't belong in the bridge contract since he has played more then 2 season at 41+games. So in reality you could have offer him 9 M a year for 4 years and I would have approved. It's not my problem you didn't look at the rules closer. 2-0 i approved this overpayment. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 21, 2017 15:09:32 GMT -5
David Pastrnak
2016-17: 1.73 ppg (46 games) - tier 1 2015-16: 1.00 ppg (51 games) - tier 3 2014-15: 0.97 ppg (75 games) - tier 3 2013-14:N/A
Rationale: This is an interesting scenario. Qualifies for bridge deal as big jump in tier group this year. He also qualifies for a salary that is below his last season pay rate as his first two seasons were two ties below. However, he is clearly on an upward trend which means he qualifies for a salary that is above his performance last year. I cancelled those two factors and offered him a bridge deal at the lower of his pay range as he just came into the 9-10M bracket.
Offer: 2 years at 9 mil. He doesn't belong in the bridge contract since he has played more then 2 season at 41+games. So in reality you could have offer him 9 M a year for 4 years and I would have approved. It's not my problem you didn't look at the rules closer. 2-0 i approved this overpayment. Doesn't he need to be in a bride deal under the second qualification of his most recent season not being replicated in any other season? |
|
|
|
Post by San Jose Sharks (Alex/Taco) on Jul 21, 2017 21:33:46 GMT -5
I approve, that's some huge cap hit.
3-0
|
|
