Rick Nash 5,000,000 (2017)

[Deleted]

2015/2016: 1.21 fpts/game (60) = Tier 2
2014/2015: 1.68 fpts/game (79) = Tier 1
2013/2014: 1.30 fpts/game (65) = Tier 2
2012/2013: 1.81 fpts/game (44) = Tier 1


**If the player's most recent season dropped by 3 or more salary ranges from the previous season (without the previous season being a fluke in the last 4 seasons), the player is only eligible for a 1 year contract.



Offer: 1 yr @ $5,000,000 (2017) (UFA)

[chris - Hartford Whalers]

have to reject. Should be higher given the year prior was a 9m season which wasn't a one off

[Devils GM(Colin)]

I approve based on the guidelines of the rules how they are written.

The 1 yr falloff rule states no guidelines on what to pay the guy if he does apply to this rule, it doesn't say to take an average or bump up one salary tier.

If there is an argument that 14/15 is a fluke, I do not believe this is correct considering he had an even better year in 12/13.

Based on the rules written, the highest I think he should be paid is 5.5 mil for 1 year.

[Smashville / PredsGM]

2-1 Hesitantly approve.

Would have liked to have seen a higher salary being a 1 year low risk deal.

[Deleted]

  Reject.  2 - 2


  1.20 fpst / game = 5.000.000, 1.21 fpst should be more than $5.000.000

[MightyDucks]

Accept 3-2. I think it's a fair deal especially for one year. I think Nash is declining a bit